Alicia Dudeney vs Emily Appleton Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining recent second serve performances, Appleton marginally edges out Dudeney with a 39.84% success rate compared to 38.26%. Can this slight advantage impact the match outcome meaningfully? Possibly, as it correlates highly with match predictions.
• In return games, Dudeney shows superior effectiveness, winning 53.53% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Appleton's 51.89%. For first serve returns, Dudeney again surpasses Appleton, winning 32.62% over 29.25%.
• Under pressure, Appleton manages to save 49.14% of breakpoints, slightly more effective than Dudeney, who saves 45.83%.
• Over the past year, Dudeney has a higher match win percentage at 68%, while Appleton comes in at 57.14%. Does this translate to better overall skill? It suggests Dudeney's consistent performance, although at different competition levels.
• Appleton's best career surface is indoor hard courts with a 59% win rate. Dudeney excels most on hard surfaces with 64% wins, which might factor into predictions for surface compatibility.
• Considering tournament levels, Dudeney shines in Futures/Satellites events, winning 80% of matches, while Appleton has a lower win rate of 53.85% at Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K.
• Looking at their head-to-head history, Appleton leads with one win in their only meeting, where she won both sets.
• Both players have limited experience in high-pressure scenarios against each other, with no deciding sets or tiebreaks played in head-to-heads.
• Against recent opponents, Appleton faces an average rank of around 337, while Dudeney's opponents averaged about 321 in rankings, giving Dudeney a competitive edge based on opponent quality.
• Appleton performs better in deciding sets generally, holding a 57% win rate compared to Dudeney's 25%, which could prove crucial in a match extending to a deciding set.
• Current event form isn't provided, yet it's crucial for assessing form momentum during the ongoing event.
• For breakpoint conversions, Dudeney again slightly outperforms Appleton with a 37.36% success rate against 36.68%.

Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing these statistics reveals subtle advantages for both players. Appleton has a slight edge in second serve performance and breakpoint saves under pressure, suggesting resilience during crucial match moments. On the other hand, Dudeney excels in return game effectiveness and overall win rates in recent play, underscoring her recent form advantage.

Their only head-to-head encounter saw Appleton triumph, which may offer her a psychological advantage. However, Dudeney's superior recent win rate and ability to compete against slightly stronger opponents could make her a formidable opponent.

Dudeney's record on hard surfaces and higher tournament success rate at Futures/Satellites levels places her in a strong position when considering the playing conditions. If the match progresses to a deciding set, Appleton's proficiency in such situations could tip the scales in her favor.

Weighing all these factors, Dudeney seems poised to secure a win based on her recent performance trends and surface affinity.